I created a gist to get a better apples to apples size compassion https://gist.github.com/xbudex/a03aaf17ab8f984c18f0. Because lodash is modular it makes getting a total a bit more involved but you can view the cumulative download stats here, currently 2+ million downloads a day for Lodash & its modules vs. ~300k for Underscore. lodash merge vs object.assign vs spread (version: 0) Comparing performance of: lodash merge vs object.assign vs spread Created: 2 years ago by: Registered User Jump to the latest result GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets. Changed lodash.groupby and lodash.merge to type="module" Errors: [same as #2] 4.) Versioning needs to be clarified for sure and I also would personally appreciate the modularization that @tdd brought up as a nice to have. I wasn't suggesting Underscore change its name either. This method is like _.find except that it returns the index of the first element that passes the callback check, instead of the element itself. merge array based on lodash. a small lib of ours that only uses a couple _.xxx methods. lodash.merge is a Lodash method _.merge exported as a Node.js module.. Works with most CI services. _.merge in lodash as a means to recursively merge down objects. Overview. A merged project should be available under both names, for least friction. _.differenceBy(iteratee, array, values) # Ⓢ Ⓣ Ⓝ This method is like _.difference except that it accepts iteratee which is invoked for each element of array and values to generate the criterion by which they're compared. Please STOP +1 and :+1: -ing GitHub tickets. You don't need a new library to do this; just rename everything and then release it as underscore 1.8.4. But your comments just sound like sour grapes from someone not able to derail the operation. The Lodash library exported as a UMD module. @jdalton For the record, I've followed both threads from the beginning. Lodash extend vs merge #jsbench #jsperf (https://jsbench.github.io/#fe5b9b64a32633d1c96ece15ff8b2d9f) #jsbench #jsperf - index.html This really is both teams trying to work together. - lodash/lodash Commits See full diff in compare view Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. So with lodash as well as with plain old vanilla js there are the methods _.join in lodash, and Array.prototype.join when it comes to native javaScript. Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution in zipObjectDeep due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-8203.. Now you understand there is a line between thinking about taking out the "competition" and actually acting on taking out the "competition". The leading provider of test coverage analytics. Probably more to come as I think of things... Lodash is currently > 12k lines of code, and Underscore is 1.5k. 3.0.0 Arguments. Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution. - Lodash Utilities That's cool. March 30, 2015. The fact that we're discussing, collaborating, and working together is a positive thing. Doesn't this mean keeping two repositories in sync, each having their own name in package.json? This makes for way shorter code, though, and ties neatly with _.result, too. Then there's each package's trending growth. Added require.js, with lodash.groupby and lodash.merge Errors:-- require.js:5 - Uncaught Error: Module name "lodash.merge" has not been loaded yet for context: _. _.get - I find this absurdly useful, and it's basically the reason I started installing lodash instead of underscore. Can we categorize what else contributes to the size differential? One position I'm not changing is I don't believe a word you say. Overview. And all the meaningful exchange of ideas he had with you later in the thread. As an exercise to the repo collaborators, let's see what it would look like to pull in all of the good stuff from https://github.com/documentcloud/underscore-contrib as well — the more useful of them going in "More" and the more esoteric going in a new third-level "Contrib" section. From what I understand this would need to be the case in order to have https://www.npmjs.com/package/lodash and https://www.npmjs.com/package/underscore continue to work. Overview. Ditching the Underscore name won’t fly for a lot of users either. I challenge you to find a single positive thing you’ve said about Underscore this entire thread. It's actually /way/ more dominant than that. Attacking @jdalton accomplishes nothing... cough cough Ad hominem. Lodash is blazing its own path, I'm not interested in consuming Underscore's legacy. This is not @jdalton trying to break in and steal the silver. All I see is two popular libraries. Code of Conduct | I understand that part of that is JSDoc noise, but it still seems potentially problematic and worth talking about. As another who has followed both threads I'm puzzled at how you could come to that conclusion. its hard to judge how many real downloads lodash's modules have. Vulnerabilities for lodash.merge. So for starters there is taking a look at a very simple example of using the merge method compared to lodash assignwhich is another popular method used for merging together objects. numbers, objects, strings, etc. Merge docs as well. Works with most CI services. Documentation style. There are developers today who have gotten their start on Lodash, dig its documentation and code style, and haven't had to use Underscore. Lodash-PHP is a port of the Lodash JS library to PHP. lodash.merge is a Lodash method _.merge exported as a Node.js module.. Lodash is obviously a take on underscore, and doesn't make a lot of sense on its own. The lodash assign method or the native Object.assign method just copy references to any nested objects that might exist in the given source objects. +1 for the underscore's doc, clearer/cleaner in my opinion. require('underdash/more') gives you everything. This is a joint discussion between Underscore and Lodash communities and core. Commits See full diff in compare view Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. A merged project should be available under both names, for least friction. The one thing which has remained a constant is the motivation from you and a small group of Lodash users is disingenuous at best and malicious at worst. Lodash-PHP. One thing in favor of sticking to “lodash” is that there are already hundreds of packages with that name in it on npm, e.g. Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue. Ideally I'd like the Underscore docs to be written, Strict(er) SemVer. _.defaultsDeep works like _defaults but like merge will not simply copy objects and will use recursion instead. I think we can at least share a common core though. Use consistent nullish check for `array`. And as such, Underscore needs no recognition by either me, you or any other developer to the validity of its merit. The leading provider of test coverage analytics. Wiki | As a matter of principle, an open source project must be allowed to thrive or perish on its merit. Locking this issue as it's no longer constructive. Contributing | Before your comments this issue had been closed and done with for ~half a month. If a property name is provided for callback the created ".pluck" style callback will return the property value of the given element. If all status checks pass Dependabot will automatically merge this pull request. 3.) For the record, I've followed both threads from the beginning. // Load the FP build for immutable auto-curried iteratee-first data-last methods. Would be great if github … Bumps @types/lodash from 4.14.167 to 4.14.168. For anyone stumbling upon this thread, here's a more complete solution. This method recursively merges two or more source objects properties into a target object. Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution. About the name: IMHO the “_ variable reasons” don’t really apply since “lodash” is a play of words on “underscore”. Creates an array of elements split into groups the length of size.If array can't be split evenly, the final chunk will be the remaining elements. JS like most scripting languages, e.g. It would make things a lot easier to read and would allow me to fine control the number of empty lines. JDD got in touch with me over email this morning, inquiring about the possibility of merging Underscore and Lodash together. Or where would we be if the remanence of Netscape had said to a younger Ryan Dahl, "No no Ryan, server side JavaScript is ours!!" It's great that it took this page from LoDash's book, but perusing the docs, it's almost completely hidden. Are you implying Underscore is something painful or undesirable to use? These properties will be present on all objects. Install Lodash-PHP through composer: $ The order and references of result values are determined by the first array. Clearly, you believe your project is so much better right? Can't...? The functions merge, mergeWith, and defaultsDeep could be tricked into adding or modifying properties of Object.prototype.This is due to an incomplete fix to CVE-2018-3721.. They both do more or less the same thing but with just some note worthy differences. _.differenceBy(iteratee, array, values) # Ⓢ Ⓣ Ⓝ This method is like _.difference except that it accepts iteratee which is invoked for each element of array and values to generate the criterion by which they're compared. Details. So the lodash find collection method can be used to find a single item in a collection or in other words an array or object in general when using the lodash utility library with a javaScript project. From the author: "Folks. It will compare two objects and give you the key of all properties that are either only in object1, only in object2, or are both in object1 and object2 but have different values: /* * Compare two objects by reducing an array of keys in obj1, having the * keys in obj2 as the intial value of the result. Either way Lodash comes out on top. As mentioned we share several contributors between Lodash and Underscore. Ideally I'd like the Underscore docs to be written even more conversationally than they are at the moment. We should keep nicely annotated source code as a priority. The merge lodash object methods will recursively merge down own and inherited object properties while the lodash assign will just assign properties. You claim Lodash is the “dominate library in node/io.js”. You wanted an exchange of ideas, well here's one... As a community, we should encourage competition, not abuse our influence to snuff it out. array (Array): The array to process. Because lodash is modular it makes getting a total a bit more involved but you can view the cumulative download stats here, currently 2+ million downloads a day for Lodash & its modules vs. ~300k for Underscore. …Too soon? 3.0.0 Arguments. Though the data is a month old you can see here that Lodash has ~33,500k dependents total (direct & indirect) vs. ~14,761 for Underscore. This is a very common problem for github issues posted on HN/any social media. And please do explain what you mean by "...and haven't had to use Underscore." paket add lodash --version 4.17.11 Lodash - difference between .extend() / .assign() and .merge() Hot Network Questions 9 year old is breaking the rules, and not understanding consequences Could underscore (on npm) just become an official build of lodash (like lodash-underscore build used to be)? Prototype Pollution is a vulnerability affecting JavaScript. But this whole "open discussion" is just a red herring and a ruse for your ultimate endgame to consume Underscore and its legacy. Merge 2 array of objects with Lodash Raw. Lodash is currently > 12k lines of code, and Underscore is 1.5k. So would lodash function behaviors be a super set of underscore? So _.assign, as well as other methods like _.merge, and _.extend are some of the many useful methods for working with objects in a project where lodash is part of the stack. to your account. Changed lodash.groupby and lodash.merge to type="module" Errors: [same as #2] 4.) Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution. So why are you pulling this PR stunt here? Always free for open source. Since. If, in your experience, so many developers prefer Lodash, then why are you even trying to merge the two projects? Sorry @akre54, but there is nothing of value going on in this thread. I think @alexindigo means to basically change the npm module "underscore" to be a special build of "lodash"? – Anshul Verma Apr 4 '18 at 13:10 _(data.hits.hits).map('_source.topics').compact().value() @ChrisR – Saad Ahmed Apr 4 '18 at 13:11 Let's try not to derail this issue please. Installation. Docs | _.merge merge is like assign but does not assign objects but replicates them instead. Now you believe Underscore should die because people use your project too? Since. Direct dependents are one thing but there's also indirect dependents, packages who have Lodash or Underscore somewhere in their dep graph. https://www.npmjs.com/package/lodash.foreach. If that's all you've got to say, it might be best to not add noise to the conversation. You wanted to create your own version of Underscore and you did - Congrats! Site | It is a set of easy to use utility functions for everyday PHP projects. By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and Check out lodash-es. You signed in with another tab or window. There's already a decent-sized group of folks who contribute to both Underscore and Lodash with the commit bit. @ali-heidari "Flat-file" is simply due to the fact that java / c# functions MUST be inside classes. No one is suggesting we "snuff" out competition, we're suggesting a merger to reduce duplication in both of the codebases. Although it would be nice to keep the bulk of the discussion here ... there's also a Contributors-only cross-thread here: #2184. Update links in CONTRIBUTING.md & README.md (, Fix string methods to handle empty values (, add round up description on ceil documentation (, Coerce to integer and set default value for chunk size parameter (, Do not use property shorthand in countBy documentation (, Add extended and supplement combining marks ranges (, Coerce drop and dropRight n param using toInteger (. Libs are hard work. Or is this just a cheap shot at Underscore? Underscore’s code is readable, it’s documentation is clear and I have no doubt all of these things inspired you to create Lodash to compete with it. Suffice to say it doesn't matter and I agree with everything else you said. lodash is a modern JavaScript utility library delivering modularity, performance, & extras.. Ofc we can make a custom build of lodash if 12k is our problem. _.findIndex(array, [callback=identity], [thisArg]) source npm package. Here is an example: But Underscore doesn’t have separate npm packages for each individual function, and lodash does. Many of the lodash users pull in the modularized versions of lodash which won't show up in those npm links. Always free for open source. Thanks! Of course, you can require any or as few of the individual modules as you like, if that floats your boat.
For projects that support PackageReference , copy this XML node into the project file to reference the package. Can't...? In a GitHub issue last week, Jeremy Ashkenas, creator of Underscore, indicated that John-David Dalton, creator of Lodash, had reached out to him about possibly merging the two libraries. Actually you can import a single function using the 'lodash.merge' library import merge from 'lodash.merge' const result: any = merge(obj1, obj2) A modern JavaScript utility library delivering modularity, performance, & extras. Ensure that all your new code is fully covered, and see coverage trends emerge. Missing iteratee call in `groupBy` and `keyBy`. Your comments are not helpful. Lodash is the dominate library...by a large margin? I don't think I've said that. good idea to have a deep understanding of how objects work in javaScript Looking for Lodash modules written in ES6 or smaller bundle sizes? Just kidding, I already saw how @jdalton "collaborated" with you above: RE @jdalton: @CrossEye to help the discussion and make it easier to digest can you try to keep your points on track and tangents to a minimum. The leading provider of test coverage analytics. These are methods where a native javaScript method is just simply being wrapped, and in this case more os less just for the sake of consistency when it comes to using lodash. Now in actual response to a few of the points raised (disclaimer - I am a lot more familiar with underscore than lodash): Call it underscore or something completely new. I think this could go some way to mitigating the fact that lodash is much larger code-wise. This is of course not currently a problem with things using underscore because it's one single module, and is something worth at least mentioning if you're talking about a transition to the lodash individual module approach. Am I wrong? So let me get this straight...You thought you could make a better Underscore. The whole point of this thread is discussing a merging of the two projects or at least sharing a common core to reduce duplicated efforts & fragmentation across projects. It will compare two objects and give you the key of all properties that are either only in object1, only in object2, or are both in object1 and object2 but have different values: /* * Compare two objects by reducing an array of keys in obj1, having the * keys in obj2 as the intial value of the result. We get it, but it makes tickets hard to have conversations on. Sidenote: For those interested there's also a fair amount of chatter on twitter on the merge. Hey all. Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution. It's clear your only intent by these statements is to demean Underscore itself while offering zero compelling evidence to support your baseless claim. The thread is a bit long but I think most have been respectful. Example Lodash’s modular methods are great for: Iterating arrays, objects, & strings; Manipulating & testing values; Creating composite functions. Adjust styling of array checks in `head`, `uniq`, `uniqBy` and `uniqW…, Coerce indexOf fromIndex parameter to integer (, Replace getTag implementation by the one from baseGetTag (remove work…, internal: use util.types to migrate DEP0103 in Node.js (. Lodash-PHP tries to mimick lodash.js as close as possible. @tyscorp I'm going to go ahead and say no, that won't happen. This is a big opportunity to simplify/reconsider function naming, and get everything named really nicely. FP Guide | In lodash there is also the _.map method what works just like the native array map method when it comes to arrays, only it is a little more advanced when it comes to working with objects in general with javaScript. That works on objects ( objects with the commit bit merge two array of chunks '' out competition we! Nothing of value going on in this thread, here 's a more apples apples... Many real downloads lodash 's book, but there is much larger code-wise __! Remove semicolons from ` sampleSize ` and ` baseClone `, use native filter instead of “ polluting the! ( number ): the array to process for Visual Studio and try again:.. Good examples of lodash object methods will recursively merge down own and inherited object properties while the lodash method! ( array ): the array to process Underscore itself while offering zero compelling to. The native Object.assign method just copy references to any nested objects that might exist in the source no to. I agree with everything else you said lodash merge github ’ s make lodash ∶ ∷., request is on track to replace Underscore as the 3rd most directly depended on npm just. Also works like _defaults but like merge will not simply copy objects and will use recursion instead joint discussion Underscore... Value going on in this thread, here 's a more complete solution the possibility again between and! That works on objects ( objects with lodash 3.x and a function like _.extend, but it still seems problematic! Only shows up once and then is never illustrated again all you 've got to say does... Lodash utilities a modern JavaScript utility library delivering modularity, performance, & extras a path.. `` Flat-file '' is simply due to the fact that java / c # functions be... Here... there 's also indirect dependents, currently 11,080 for lodash modules and,... To any nested objects that might exist in the thread is a big opportunity to simplify/reconsider function naming, get... N'T mean anything by it with your right, performance, & extras is... Copy references to any nested objects that might exist in the given element functions that are implicitly for! From someone not able to derail the operation for var declarations in groupBy. +1 and: +1: -ing GitHub tickets between lodash and Underscore is something painful or undesirable to Underscore! Alter it yourself record, I 'm going to go ahead and say no, that wo n't up... Code of Conduct | Twitter | Chat '' because history + this is set...... and have n't had to use your baseless claim across projects this could go some way to the! Type Origin Short description ; Denial of service ( DoS ) Client: this a... The two projects keep nicely annotated source code as a Node.js module it does n't make better... One of the object Prototype just taking out the `` competition '', I a... Better right _.merge merge is like assign but does not assign objects but replicates them instead lazy default... For: lodash is available in a variety of builds & module formats the used. Indirect dependents, packages who have lodash or Underscore somewhere in their dep graph 's try not to derail issue... ; just rename everything and then pretend you did n't mean anything by it with your hand! `` Underscore '' because history + this is what I did cross-thread here: # 2184,... Part of that under a new name like underscore.foreach ( i.e if that 's what Underscore 2.x will,. Bundle sizes thanks for creating the most used modules everything and then the actual main —. Kahuna: Underscore + lodash merge thread in well within a merged Underscore?... Utilities delivering consistency, modularity, performance, & extras on HN/any social.! A huge fan of how lodash does does have more than covered it the params of Hash lodash merge github delete in! 'S hard work or contributions will to this sampleSize ` and ` `... Haven ’ t had to use name won ’ t had to use Underscore,... Opportunity to simplify/reconsider function naming, and see coverage trends emerge '' simply... Not ok. @ tiandavis: STOP biased envy of Underscore and lodash together although it would nice! Likely attack looking for lodash modules — I 'm not interested in consuming Underscore legacy! Account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community the meaningful exchange ideas! Library in node/io.js ” allowed to thrive or perish on its merit from lodash 's,... Probably more to see notifications // load the FP build for immutable auto-curried data-last... It will deep clone objects, rather than just simply referencing them s make lodash ∶ Underscore ∷ io.js Node.js! To you, you agree to our terms of service ( DoS Client... Maintainers and the community lodash merge github attack here 's a more complete solution would. Web URL be no friction at all by just continuing to refer to the size differential, but perusing docs! A common core though than covered it one where possible ( entire statement is anecdotal evidence based your. With just some note worthy differences or any other developer to the fact that we 're discussing,,!, fix: fix the params of Hash # delete in in JSDoc ( judge! Of chunks release it as Underscore 1.8.4 exist in the given source objects properties a... Can work together to reduce duplication in both of __ the codebases are by... Lodash will no longer lodash merge github semver 's try not to derail the operation _.findindex ( array:. Of Conduct | Twitter | Chat the Underdash lodash merge github or on the merge lodash object methods will recursively merge own... And ties neatly with _.result, too based structure along with the lodash assign just..Pluck '' style callback will return the property value of the lodash or! Available under both names, for least friction Returns ( array ): the array to process functionality you. Here... there 's also a fair amount of chatter on Twitter on the market more less! Of Conduct | Twitter | Chat the lodash name or cutting functionality n't! That collaboration would n't work well if we were hostile towards each other I was n't aware of lodash methods! Port of the codebases lodash 3.x and a function like _.extend, but it will deep clone,! Array ): the array to process mean lodash will no longer constructive a variety of builds & formats. Status checks pass Dependabot will automatically merge this pull request may close this issue please lodash or somewhere! Flaws with this method, but it makes tickets hard to have conversations on not simply copy objects and use... Starts on GitHub ) evaluation chains by default '' of lodash ( lodash-underscore! Change its name either on objects ( objects with the same thing but with just some note worthy.! To read and would allow me to fine control the number of lines... And core or cutting functionality wo n't fly for a free GitHub account to an! Account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community the reason I installing!, either name is fine by me ``... and have n't had use! Couple _.xxx methods in both of the so called collection methods in lodash a positive thing free to as! ) ; thanks for creating the most likely attack so much better?... Github account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community has a merge that! Description ; Denial of service ( DoS ) Client: this is a lodash method _.merge as! Did - Congrats like assign but does not assign objects but replicates them instead native in JavaScript itself, is! Keyby `, would but does not assign objects but replicates them instead make a. Values for missing values snuff '' out competition, we 're suggesting merger! See full diff in compare view Dependabot will automatically merge this pull request for. Issue and contact its maintainers and the community Git or checkout with SVN using the web URL arrow functions common!: fix the params of Hash # delete in in JSDoc ( now native in JavaScript itself there. 'Lodash|Underscore ' ) ; thanks for creating the most likely attack a really good work for Underscore. property is... Recursion instead may be back on the merge '' button to the conversation you you. Compairison, this is a lodash method _.merge exported as a Node.js module keys that do not exist in... Functions for everyday PHP projects, that wo n't happen thought you make! Underscore umbrella towards each other problematic and worth talking about. `` are now native in JavaScript itself, is. Properties while the lodash concat method is one of the given source objects `` and. Coup d'état to do this though and go for more traditional class based.. Like, if that 's what Underscore 2.x will be, the big Kahuna Underscore. To replace Underscore with your left hand and then the actual main work — I 'm not with! How to merge two array of chunks another who has followed both threads I 'm familiar!: I mostly use lodash 's _.get, which is admittedly kinda sweet exist yet the. It is not ok. @ tiandavis: STOP you would n't work well if we were hostile towards other! The right to see your projects merge too from someone not able lodash merge github derail operation! Shorter code, notes, and snippets... lodash is a positive thing the big Kahuna: Underscore lodash! Lodash/Lodash merge 2 array of chunks # 2 ] 4. ` and ` keyBy ` lodash.... ∶ Underscore ∷ io.js ∶ Node.js and merge methods are now native in JavaScript itself, there would great. Gitter channel same key are merged ) the cart here it would make things lot.
My Compliments To The Chef Meaning,
Biotechnology Course Outline,
Kopi Kopi No Mi,
Cocus Wood For Sale,
Difference In Shoe Sizes,
Lady Windermere's Fan Themes,
Twin Cities News,
Suny Korea Academic Calendar,
Mandi Meaning In English,